To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 28 09:28:36 -0700
2005 ---
TRA: The proposed VCL hack should only be the last resort. Nobody inside Sun is
re
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 24 13:05:20 -0700
2005 ---
ericb->pluby
No, I have really added these changes, but since I have added ' #incl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 24 11:31:29 -0700
2005 ---
I think that you might have not added the changes in vcl/unx/inc/salinst.h:
> 1. I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 24 10:58:26 -0700
2005 ---
ericb->fheckl
Ooops, yes,my mistake I don't know why, I commented the bad
ExecuteA
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 24 09:23:20 -0700
2005 ---
fheckl->ericb:
Looking at your last patch I see the following line:
+//void Execute
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 23 17:06:53 -0700
2005 ---
I forgot to mention : the update of vos::OThread (the use of vos is deprecated)
for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 23 16:57:43 -0700
2005 ---
Hi,
I have still problems for building. I must be blind, but i don't find why the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 20 09:09:37 -0700
2005 ---
I have a couple of details to add:
1. In my proposed code, there is a line missing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 20 01:32:25 -0700
2005 ---
Hi,
Yes, I think too there's no other possibility. Waiting, I have add vcl module
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 20 00:56:45 -0700
2005 ---
It seems there is no other way then if we want Java to work on Mac.
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 19 09:08:01 -0700
2005 ---
Unfortunately, I would guess that this behavior is permanent based on the fact
that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 19 01:02:58 -0700
2005 ---
jl->pluby: Thanks very much for explaining. Is there a chance that the Mac JRE
will
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 18 18:44:24 -0700
2005 ---
pluby->jl
I understand your desire to put this code in one of the jvm frameworks.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 18 01:21:48 -0700
2005 ---
JL->ericb: I think modifiying code outside the jvmfwk project to get Java to
functi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 17 13:02:56 -0700
2005 ---
I would recommend *not* putting patches into the desktop module for the
following t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 17 12:19:40 -0700
2005 ---
ericb -> pluby
Thank you very much for your proposition :-) Looks very interessan
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 17 11:17:32 -0700
2005 ---
I ran into this same problem in NeoOffice/J with Java 1.4.x and I have code that
fi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 17 01:50:27 -0700
2005 ---
ericb -> maho
Yes, for example File->Wizards->Web page
About macros, you just ha
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 16 18:45:35 -0700
2005 ---
if it is possible please attach beanshell macro as well
so that I can reproduce you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 16 18:44:31 -0700
2005 ---
eric:
could you please describe this issue more in detail?
I couldn't reproduce you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
28 matches
Mail list logo
