To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 23 16:12:34 -0700
2005 ---
patch #5 builds ok with gcj-4.0 on gnu/linux sparc using system libxml.
I made
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 7 03:17:27 -0700
2005 ---
the patch is not yet optimal, because when xmlsec1-.xx.patch will be modified,
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
User maxweber changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 7 06:29:08 -0700
2005 ---
the patch above this is a more clean approach,
to test only apply patch #5, #1 to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 6 04:29:24 -0700
2005 ---
Using GNU/Linux sparc debian/unstable
First removed my /usr/include/libxml hack
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
User maxweber changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 5 12:59:31 -0700
2005 ---
attaching patches for illustration,
the idea is to not execute the fake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
User maxweber changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
User maxweber changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 5 13:05:15 -0700
2005 ---
diff between regular xmlsec.patch and USE_XML2-SYSTEM.patch for illustration:
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
User maxweber changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 5 13:08:02 -0700
2005 ---
builds fine here
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 5 13:25:02 -0700
2005 ---
ahem, of course it has to be
+.IF SYSTEM_LIBXML==YES instead of
+.IF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
User maxweber changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
User maxweber changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 5 13:49:13 -0700
2005 ---
patchset working now and open for discussion,
for testing please apply patches #2
18 matches
Mail list logo