[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 User sparcmoz changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 User sparcmoz changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 User sparcmoz changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 User kso changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 13 03:06:00 -0800 2006 --- This builds OK on GNU/Linux sparc and all the wizards function OK (except not

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 13 03:44:46 -0800 2006 --- There was a bug in m155 which caused the letter wizard to fail. This was fixed in

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 13 12:11:48 -0800 2006 --- @jl: I committed the patch in cws_src680_jw1 (sorry i missed your last message)

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 9 08:50:11 -0800 2005 --- The patch looks allright for me. However, I do not use and test this JRE. So if

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 User mh changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 4 07:06:38 -0800 2005 --- This assertion (OSL_ENSURE) is in VendorBase::compareVersions(const rtl::OUString

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 User sparcmoz changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 User sparcmoz changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53393] VendorBase::compareVersio ns must be overridden in derived class

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53393 User sparcmoz changed the following: What|Old value |New value