[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-10-10 Thread sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 10 03:11:07 -0700 2005 --- Re cppuhelper: I am confused by your remarks. off_t is not C99 (but SUS), and is

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-10-09 Thread panbk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 9 14:22:40 -0700 2005 --- The intptr-cppuhelper.diff, although an improvement, is incomplete -- it uses

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-09-22 Thread tbo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 User tbo changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-09-20 Thread sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 20 00:37:43 -0700 2005 --- @kendy: Fix looks good to me. If you find the time, it would be great if you

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-09-20 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 20 02:53:32 -0700 2005 --- The new build is uploaded (again in http://www.go-oo.org/tstooo/intptr-m128/ ,

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-09-19 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 05:27:12 -0700 2005 --- Just for the record, the build of the CWS is here:

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-09-19 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 User kendy changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-09-19 Thread sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 User sb changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-09-19 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 User kendy changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-09-16 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 16 02:37:47 -0700 2005 --- Committed the sal_IntPtr - sal_uIntPtr changes to the CWS.

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-09-15 Thread sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 04:34:57 -0700 2005 --- Code reviewed. I spotted three places where a pointer is now converted to

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-09-15 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 05:58:36 -0700 2005 --- Martin, these are from your patches, could you have a look, please?

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-09-15 Thread mkretzschmar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 07:04:25 -0700 2005 --- Yes, sorry. Somehow I overlooked sal_uIntPtr's existence when gcc made me do the

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-09-15 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 07:10:28 -0700 2005 --- sb: May I commit a change of these to the CWS yet, please?

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-09-14 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 User kendy changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 54498] 64bit: sal_IntPtr/sal_uIn tPtr

2005-09-12 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value