[porting-issues] [Issue 56097] lost backtrace on GNU/Lin ux Sparc

2006-03-24 Thread sparcmoz
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56097 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 24 02:06:32 -0800 2006 --- A possible solution from cmc, will need check in m161 Even if it is explicitly

[porting-issues] [Issue 56097] lost backtrace on GNU/Lin ux Sparc

2006-01-24 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56097 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 56097] lost backtrace on GNU/Lin ux Sparc

2005-11-23 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56097 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 56097] lost backtrace on GNU/Lin ux Sparc

2005-11-09 Thread sparcmoz
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56097 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 9 05:19:30 -0800 2005 --- backtrace is working again on linux sparc in m137, i dont know if these are

[porting-issues] [Issue 56097] lost backtrace on GNU/Lin ux Sparc

2005-10-30 Thread sparcmoz
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56097 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 30 02:01:42 -0700 2005 --- More things to do: (c) look at signal.c, we are not including backtrace.h!

[porting-issues] [Issue 56097] lost backtrace on GNU/Lin ux Sparc

2005-10-16 Thread sparcmoz
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56097 User sparcmoz changed the following: What|Old value |New value