[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-02-13 Thread of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 User of changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-02-09 Thread maho
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 16:06:32 -0800 2006 --- I'm not a QA person and not assigned person but fix appeared on SRC680_m156. ---

[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-02-01 Thread of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 User of changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-01-31 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-01-31 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-01-31 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-01-26 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 03:12:53 -0800 2006 --- Done. Could you check this again?

[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-01-26 Thread maho
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 04:34:16 -0800 2006 --- verified. now it seems to be fine! thank you very much Joachim! --

[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-01-24 Thread maho
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 24 16:55:34 -0800 2006 --- jl: thanks for committing my patch! sorry but as rt noticed, @@ -208,7 +208,16 @@

[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-01-24 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 24 01:33:07 -0800 2006 --- jl->maho: I applied your patch on cws jl30. The cws tag is cws_src680_jl30. Could y

[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-01-23 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-01-19 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-01-19 Thread maho
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 19 04:46:35 -0800 2006 --- rt: > For me your patch looks good, perhaps except the duplicate if condition in yo

[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-01-19 Thread rt
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 User rt changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 56953] FreeBSD porting : do not hardcode pXX of Java version and FreeBSD nativ e Java is always superior to Linux's one.

2006-01-18 Thread maho
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 User maho changed the following: What|Old value |New value ===