[porting-issues] [Issue 57043] Complete the feature se nd active document as on Mac OS X for other mua's

2006-04-28 Thread obr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57043 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 27 23:34:49 -0700 2006 --- I assume you are referring to

[porting-issues] [Issue 57043] Complete the feature se nd active document as on Mac OS X for other mua's

2006-04-27 Thread obr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57043 User obr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 57043] Complete the feature se nd active document as on Mac OS X for other mua's

2006-04-27 Thread jjmckenzie
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57043 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 27 22:45:37 -0700 2006 --- obr: Is this not a Thunderbird problem and not an OpenOffice.org problem? I

[porting-issues] [Issue 57043] Complete the feature se nd active document as on Mac OS X for other mua's

2006-03-26 Thread obr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57043 User obr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 57043] Complete the feature se nd active document as on Mac OS X for other mua's

2006-01-16 Thread obr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57043 User obr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 57043] Complete the feature se nd active document as on Mac OS X for other mua's

2006-01-15 Thread obr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57043 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 15 22:52:57 -0800 2006 --- Hi eric, #2 and #3 won't work with open and I don't think these are valid use

[porting-issues] [Issue 57043] Complete the feature se nd active document as on Mac OS X for other mua's

2006-01-15 Thread ericb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57043 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 15 23:56:43 -0800 2006 --- ericb-obr I have tested 2 and 3 because it's not possible to validate when a

[porting-issues] [Issue 57043] Complete the feature se nd active document as on Mac OS X for other mua's

2006-01-13 Thread ericb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57043 User ericb changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 57043] Complete the feature se nd active document as on Mac OS X for other mua's

2006-01-09 Thread obr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57043 User obr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 57043] Complete the feature se nd active document as on Mac OS X for other mua's

2006-01-08 Thread obr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57043 User obr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 57043] Complete the feature se nd active document as on Mac OS X for other mua's

2006-01-06 Thread obr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57043 User obr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 57043] Complete the feature se nd active document as on Mac OS X for other mua's

2005-10-31 Thread ericb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57043 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 31 05:47:04 -0800 2005 --- Ooops, description was wrong. I propose a new and understandable version :