To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 8 01:49:19 -0700
2006 ---
Setting to verified without further testing as i have no suitable testing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User thb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User thb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User thb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User thb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User thb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 9 06:34:36 -0700
2006 ---
-thb: Yeah sure... Haven't tested with gcc 4.1, but I don't think that
particular
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 8 19:17:30 -0700
2006 ---
Can we set this for 2.0.4 and get it into a CWS?
James M.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
This issue depends on issue 51397, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User jjmckenzie changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User jjmckenzie changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 17 00:28:44 -0800
2006 ---
added dbo to CC.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 2 08:30:27 -0800
2006 ---
I very much doubt that my simple change would break other platforms. And it's
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 1 16:35:53 -0800
2006 ---
Mox:
Need your patch that bypasses Solaris for qa/testing.
James
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User jjmckenzie changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 22 00:19:59 -0800
2006 ---
If 1.33 bombs for the Sun compiler, another viable option is to stay with 1.30.2
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 21 11:59:40 -0800
2006 ---
The i60951-disable-gcc-warnings.patch makes the necessary changes to quiet down
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User jjmckenzie changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 20 05:28:41 -0800
2006 ---
jjmckenzie: Do we want to upgrade boost or disable warnings? Is upgrade worth
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User dbo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User jjmckenzie changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 19 19:29:06 -0800
2006 ---
this difference file works under MacOSX PPC and was synched with m156. Needs
test
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 19 19:31:19 -0800
2006 ---
jjmckenzie - ericb
You are correct. The OS needs to be changed to All. Can you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 10 05:04:18 -0800
2006 ---
ericb- jjmckenzie
If I understand correctly you want to upgrade boost version ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 10 09:08:20 -0800
2006 ---
jjmckenzie - ericb
You are correct. I need a CWS for this issue. Time to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 20:01:08 -0800
2006 ---
Completed successful build with m155. No additional errors encountered.
Working
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 7 13:33:41 -0800
2006 ---
Michael:
Please assign this issue to me. I am going to try using Boost 1.33.1
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 6 19:34:40 -0800
2006 ---
Additional information:
Boost 1.33.1 includes support for GCC 4.0.
James
32 matches
Mail list logo