[porting-issues] [Issue 62350] IBM JRE and and env. vari able JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE

2006-05-28 Thread ericb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62350 User ericb changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 62350] IBM JRE and and env. vari able JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE

2006-03-19 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62350 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 62350] IBM JRE and and env. vari able JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE

2006-03-19 Thread ericb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62350 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 19 02:59:19 -0800 2006 --- ericb-pjanik I do confirm that OpenOffice.org using IBM jre 1.4.x or superior

[porting-issues] [Issue 62350] IBM JRE and and env. vari able JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE

2006-03-19 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62350 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 19 03:04:32 -0800 2006 --- ericb: and other Java apps? Forget about OOo for the moment.

[porting-issues] [Issue 62350] IBM JRE and and env. vari able JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE

2006-03-15 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62350 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 62350] IBM JRE and and env. vari able JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE

2006-02-27 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62350 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 27 01:37:03 -0800 2006 --- pjanik you are right. If it is an apps issue, then we should not make changes to

[porting-issues] [Issue 62350] IBM JRE and and env. vari able JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE

2006-02-26 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62350 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 26 02:05:26 -0800 2006 --- After reading more about this, I think it is system issue, not apps issue. This

[porting-issues] [Issue 62350] IBM JRE and and env. vari able JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE

2006-02-22 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62350 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 22 01:40:10 -0800 2006 --- Thanks for the link, that was helpful. After discussing this problem internally we

[porting-issues] [Issue 62350] IBM JRE and and env. vari able JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE

2006-02-21 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62350 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 21 02:03:16 -0800 2006 --- @pjanik: Is there some document that explains this variable?

[porting-issues] [Issue 62350] IBM JRE and and env. vari able JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE

2006-02-21 Thread ericb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62350 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 21 02:12:47 -0800 2006 --- ericb-jl JITC processor type is needed when IBM runtime environment is needed.

[porting-issues] [Issue 62350] IBM JRE and and env. vari able JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE

2006-02-21 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62350 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 21 03:34:07 -0800 2006 --- Ok, I did not notice that this is already integrated. So the question is, if there

[porting-issues] [Issue 62350] IBM JRE and and env. vari able JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE

2006-02-21 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62350 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 21 13:32:40 -0800 2006 --- jl: see http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/l-pow-apple.html for