To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 23 06:34:21 -0700
2006 ---
kendy:
now I'm testing the builds for OOC680_m6 and SRC680_m172.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 23 07:13:14 -0700
2006 ---
Test In FreeBSD 6.1 and amd64, OOo2.0.3rc5 didn't work. It compiles ok, but we
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 23 07:23:16 -0700
2006 ---
In light of what pan writes, and in light of the below message which I just
posted
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 23 08:18:52 -0700
2006 ---
(And I guess that the leeway to allow NULL to be defined as any of 0, 0L, etc.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 23 10:05:52 -0700
2006 ---
This has been haunting many projects for long time and GCC is, of course, one of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 23 10:10:10 -0700
2006 ---
FYI, I had the patch here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/patch-sentinel
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 23 11:33:40 -0700
2006 ---
FYI, my patch is updated with fpicker fixes.
15 matches
Mail list logo