To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
User sparcmoz changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 2 11:50:39 +
2007 ---
Jim? What is the status?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 2 22:06:15 +
2007 ---
The last important comment was this one:
quote
--- Additional comments from
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 23 05:20:06 +
2007 ---
I know this is not supported, but just for the record, another variation using
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
User sparcmoz changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 11 00:17:45 -0800
2007 ---
Being a link should be ok, and that's the path I'd expect it to look into, the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
Issue #|73328
Summary|building vanilla with java-gcj-compat
Component|porting
Version|OOo 2.2
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 10 03:16:51 -0800
2007 ---
sparcmoz: it is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
User sparcmoz changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
User sparcmoz changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
User sparcmoz changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
User sparcmoz changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 10 03:54:28 -0800
2007 ---
constantly patching that file to add an infinite no of libs isn't really
desirable
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
User sparcmoz changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 10 16:29:29 -0800
2007 ---
more information:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr$ ls -la
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73328
User maho changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
17 matches
Mail list logo