To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74117
User thb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74117
User thb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74117
User thb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74117
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 2 11:49:14 +
2007 ---
@sb: sounds like a plan to me. will whip up something along this lines...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74117
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 2 10:17:31 +
2007 ---
"that extra level of indirection might do, but only if we limit the cast to a
finit
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74117
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 2 09:52:26 +
2007 ---
@sb: regarding integral vs. arithmetic types - yes, I understand the initial
intent
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74117
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 2 09:49:52 +
2007 ---
regarding boost inclusion: yes, that extra level of indirection might do, but
only
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74117
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 2 09:48:29 +
2007 ---
Also, I am not that happy with extending static_int_cast to arbitrary arithmetic
ty
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74117
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 2 09:46:55 +
2007 ---
hrmpf. appears that msdn does not like deep links. try this:
http://msdn2.microsoft
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74117
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 2 09:37:46 +
2007 ---
We have deliberately avoided to include boost in the URE API (SDK does not
provide
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74117
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 2 09:34:09 +
2007 ---
But generally, I think this or something quite similar will, like STLP_DEBUG,
unear
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74117
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 2 09:30:21 +
2007 ---
I'm aware that including boost headers in sal might be a bad idea, further more,
th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74117
User thb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74117
Issue #|74117
Summary|Adding runtime checks to static_int_cast
Component|porting
Version|current
14 matches
Mail list logo