To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 14 21:31:31 +
2007 ---
closing as we seen on SRC680_m220.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78032
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78032
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 5 21:29:32 +
2007 ---
set target milestone 2.3.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78032
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78032
Issue #|78032
Summary|FreeBSD porting : do not need to link against libsupc+
|+ in module store
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 2 01:41:37 +
2007 ---
see also
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54460
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 2 01:42:48 +
2007 ---
here is the original message from jkim.
With GCC 3.x, they added libsupc++.so
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78032
User maho changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
