To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 4 18:09:04 +
2007 ---
->Kendy: Applied and committed ... ;-)
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 4 16:19:45 +
2007 ---
Pavel, before you do, could you please commit a tiny change:
_ZN4cppu20OPropertyA
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 4 15:23:48 +
2007 ---
->Pavel, could you check this again (and put it on verified)? Thanks in advance.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 28 07:43:02 +
2007 ---
->SB: I aware of Caolans work regarding the map files, I am going to discuss
this w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 28 06:28:38 +
2007 ---
@kr: Are you aware of cmc's current cppuhelper/salhelper map file cleanup
(cws_src
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 27 18:27:14 +
2007 ---
->kr: yes, FreeBSD has the same ABI as Linux.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 27 18:05:25 +
2007 ---
->jkim: You mean the gcc3_linux_intel.map file works for FreeBSD? Does that
mean, t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 27 17:12:42 +
2007 ---
->kr, I am sorry that I missed your last comment. :-( I cannot speak for MacOSX
bu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 27 17:08:30 +
2007 ---
->kr, I made a separate map file for FreeBSD/amd64 and it worked okay. The last
pa
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 27 14:56:07 +
2007 ---
Just checked in (unomacli64) some fixes for cppuhelper and Linux x86-64, the
brave
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User jnavrati changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 27 11:53:56 +
2007 ---
Quick summary:
Since bunoexttm (SRC680_m212) on Unix (and alike) systems map files
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 17:36:30 +
2007 ---
Ah, it was addressed by issue 77975 and partially fixed in CWS cmcfixes35. I
say p
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 08:01:47 +
2007 ---
Just to keep you updated, it seems that some platforms don't use map files for
cppu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User ht990332 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 22 20:13:20 +
2007 ---
I forgot to add environment detail. It is FreeBSD/amd64 -CURRENT and GCC 4.2.
I t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 22 20:05:40 +
2007 ---
Can you verified the attached patch as well? We should not add CFLAGSNOOPT
after e
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 22 20:01:40 +
2007 ---
jkim: yes, that solution is much better.
Kay?
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 22 19:55:18 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46196)
Use NOOPTFILES instead of adding CFLAGSNOOPT
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 20 12:34:41 +
2007 ---
->Pavel, sorry for not informing you ... you certainly can delete my ssh account
an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 20 10:33:00 +
2007 ---
kr: unomacli64?
Can I delete builddir on test machine?
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 20 10:20:28 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 77991 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 20 10:18:44 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 78300 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 16 19:03:27 +
2007 ---
Hi,
for some (certainly discussable,let me know if you are interested) reason, the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 15 11:56:48 +
2007 ---
->SB: I can not confirm your observations, building with local gcc and with
"-fuse-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 15 09:02:47 +
2007 ---
Still, I see crashes with the Sun-local gcc 3.4.1 (and --enable-__cxa_atexit is
pro
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 15 08:46:30 +
2007 ---
Guys, sorry for disappointing you, the fix is not yet ready (but close to :-). I
th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 14 13:32:32 +
2007 ---
kr: you rock!
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 14 11:33:44 +
2007 ---
OK, it seems I finally found a fix for this.
Actually
i78284 (this issue), i78300
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 14 07:04:40 +
2007 ---
@kr: "it shouldn't be experienced in SO builds" --- Fits into the picture, as I
ex
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 13 18:02:52 +
2007 ---
I finally managed to get a stacktrace (thanks to Pavel):
(gdb) info threads
3 pr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 13 11:59:41 +
2007 ---
->Pavel, I just build unomacli64 successfully on a Ubuntu 64bit box (note: the
fixe
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 10:05:23 +
2007 ---
yes, you can build 32bit on 64bit, but you have to use Xen or linux32 to fake
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 09:25:41 +
2007 ---
I have not experienced this on any of the platforms (unxlngi6, wntmsci10,
unxsols4)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User rt changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 07:21:13 +
2007 ---
FYI: I just experienced the exact same problem (regcomp spuriously successfully
re
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
Issue #|78284
Summary|Random packaging failures (regcomp failes) after SRC68
|0_m212
Component|porting
49 matches
Mail list logo
