To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 29 20:31:21 +
2007 ---
ericb: I have not tried to do a full build with all these fixes.
But I think it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
This issue depends on issue 83486, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
This issue depends on issue 83519, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 09:49:13 +
2007 ---
sb:
How should I read that page then?
The OpenOffice 3.0 code line will be the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 09:21:22 +
2007 ---
FWIW, Sun seems to plan to get rid of it (for 3.0), too:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 09:42:11 +
2007 ---
@rene: ...but at least for the usage of STLport within the C++ UNO ABI we
cannot
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 09:58:27 +
2007 ---
Maybe discuss all that on the list, this little bug here is just my modest
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
This issue depends on issue 72150, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 21 07:08:54 +
2007 ---
cmc:
ah, yes. It's obvious now that you said it. Sorry for my sloppy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 20 21:53:30 +
2007 ---
FWIW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664 is what we're testing the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 20 22:20:14 +
2007 ---
cmc:
I did the command
echo #include string | gcc -x c++ -E - /tmp/string
as you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 20 22:28:08 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=49051)
output of the command described by cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 20 22:40:42 +
2007 ---
cmc-mox: well your headers look perfect for using visibility with them, which
fits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 20 22:57:26 +
2007 ---
It says:
checking if STL headers are visibility safe... no
configure: error: Your
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User sjanki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 19 08:13:18 +
2007 ---
cmc-sparcmoz: It's your call which way you want your port to lean wrt.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 18 21:24:29 +
2007 ---
For GNU/Linux SPARC the general approach has been try and maintain upstream with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
Issue #|82715
Summary|Use system gcc stl for all Linux ports except for loc
|ked-in ones
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 17 12:48:29 +
2007 ---
Well, if it was me, I'd default to system-stl even on Linux x86 ;-) - the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 17 12:59:12 +
2007 ---
I'd *suspect* that upstreams linux gcc doesn't have safe stl headers for use
with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82715
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
34 matches
Mail list logo