To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 5 08:08:25 +
2007 ---
rt: it can't be wrong, if it changes the build that is not able to finish to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
User rt changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 5 08:36:18 +
2007 ---
@tono Unfortunately, there is one case in testtools/source/bridgetest.: I
assume
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 5 09:47:53 +
2007 ---
sb: tested it (http://tmp.janik.cz/i82951.diff). Works OK in cygwin. Thanks.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 5 10:13:24 +
2007 ---
testtools patch submitted as masterfix, too.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 5 07:22:12 +
2007 ---
pjanik, tono: What does that mean now, take as masterfix or not? Sorry, I am a
bit
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 3 10:00:31 +
2007 ---
@all:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
Maybe, unless we really have a regcomp call that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 2 19:39:55 +
2007 ---
Thanks, Pavel.
Does that mean that I don't need to do a test as requested by
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 1 07:41:25 +
2007 ---
sc: the patch doesn't help here.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 1 09:11:42 +
2007 ---
@vq: Avoiding guw here seems to be no option, as the complete command line in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 1 09:20:32 +
2007 ---
sb: yes, guw patched, compiler and copied:
[EMAIL
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 1 09:26:54 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=49313)
new log files
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 1 10:24:57 +
2007 ---
@pjanik: logs.zip seems to indicate that my guw.exe regcomp file: hack does not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 1 10:47:51 +
2007 ---
Patch was applied. I added -ldbg to WRAPCMD and the log is attached now.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 1 10:48:26 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=49317)
logs with -ldbg added to WRAPCMD
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 1 10:37:03 +
2007 ---
The log contains:
-c file;///f;C:\cygwin\home\pavel\Bui...
is this correct? I do
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 1 13:09:15 +
2007 ---
@pjanik: I can not see what is going wrong. With the guw.cc hack applied, you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 31 16:18:17 +
2007 ---
@pjanik,vq: After hjs enlightened me somewhat about guw, would changing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 31 21:04:25 +
2007 ---
Maybe, unless we really have a regcomp call that has
file:///cygdrive/c/foo/bar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 30 16:39:04 +
2007 ---
@pjanik: The excerpt from the log file looks strange; can you please attach the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 30 20:43:55 +
2007 ---
sure - two logs attached inside tar.gz - log from build in instsetoo_native and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 30 20:44:32 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=49278)
log files
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 28 22:51:46 +
2007 ---
@pjanik: Sorry, I am traveling and my systems are down. Cannot check :(
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
Issue #|82951
Summary|SRC680_m234: can't create installsets
Component|porting
Version|680m234
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82951
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
32 matches
Mail list logo