[porting-issues] [Issue 88160] 64bit: sw/source/core/doc/ dbgoutsw.cxx breaks with --enable-dbgutil on a md64

2008-11-05 Thread mechtilde
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88160 User mechtilde changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 88160] 64bit: sw/source/core/doc/ dbgoutsw.cxx breaks with --enable-dbgutil on a md64

2008-09-11 Thread hbrinkm
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88160 User hbrinkm changed the following: What|Old value |New value ==

[porting-issues] [Issue 88160] 64bit: sw/source/core/doc/ dbgoutsw.cxx breaks with --enable-dbgutil on a md64

2008-06-07 Thread maho
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88160 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 8 00:51:21 + 2008 --- Hmm in DEV300_m15 it has been fixed as: if ((sal_uIntPtr)pItem != SAL_MAX_S

[porting-issues] [Issue 88160] 64bit: sw/source/core/doc/ dbgoutsw.cxx breaks with --enable-dbgutil on a md64

2008-04-11 Thread sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88160 User sb changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 88160] 64bit: sw/source/core/doc/ dbgoutsw.cxx breaks with --enable-dbgutil on a md64

2008-04-11 Thread saperski
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88160 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 11 09:15:50 + 2008 --- I've had a quick look and I've found that there is a "state" of SfxPoolItem sometim

[porting-issues] [Issue 88160] 64bit: sw/source/core/doc/ dbgoutsw.cxx breaks with --enable-dbgutil on a md64

2008-04-11 Thread sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88160 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 11 08:46:07 + 2008 --- @saperski: It needs to be clarified how the bit pattern is written into the pointe