To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
User hr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 15 22:15:16 +
2009 ---
maho: done, thanks
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 15 06:47:37 +
2009 ---
Hi rene
thanks for your good work and asking me about it.
For FreeBSD, currently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 15 00:25:21 +
2009 ---
ok, so so I changed it to
--- configure.in(Revision 266120)
+++ configur
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 14 10:04:06 +
2009 ---
OH oh, no caffeine yet so I got a lot of those pesky double negations wrong ...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 14 10:00:23 +
2009 ---
@sb, @rene: Solaris Sparc 64 bit is not AFAIK not dead. At least I have the task
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 14 09:29:23 +
2009 ---
sb: ok, if that port really is dead... will remove that if
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 14 08:45:44 +
2009 ---
Re 1: FYI, citing from a (unfortunately Sun-Hamburg internal) wiki page about
un
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 14 08:37:20 +
2009 ---
1. Hmm, well, I just noticed cwses for it. (And who told me that it uses
system-s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 14 08:30:11 +
2009 ---
@rene:
1 There are no working Solaris 64bit ports currently (there was an exper
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
Issue #|98048
Summary|harmonize --with{out}-stlport default
Component|porting
Version|current
Pla
17 matches
Mail list logo
