To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User sweigel changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from swei...@openoffice.org Sun Dec 28 18:11:55
+ 2008 ---
verified in DEV300_m38
I confirm stable sorting. Good job so far. Thank you!
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from swei...@openoffice.org Sun Dec 28 18:08:33
+ 2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=59043)
Testfile for testcase
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from swei...@openoffice.org Sun Dec 28 18:07:38
+ 2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=59042)
For the records: testcase for this issue
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User sweigel changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User maoyg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 11 10:57:23 +
2008 ---
Proposal for modified TestCaseSpecification in order to really proof "stable
sortin
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User oc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 20:21:53 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=58693)
Testdocument for Test Case Specification
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 20:20:54 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=58692)
TestCaseSpecification
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User nn changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User nn changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User nn changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 19 18:18:21 +
2008 ---
*** Issue 22884 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User nn changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 11 03:46:58 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=56404)
The patch file is about i20491#-v3.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 10 11:52:14 +
2008 ---
@maoyg: A quick glance revealed that the sort on original position is done
already
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User maoyg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User maoyg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 10 10:42:25 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=56378)
The patch file is about i20491#-v2.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 8 08:49:14 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=56313)
The patch file is about i20491#-v1.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 1 07:55:00 +
2008 ---
Plaese have a look at issue #7277 and issue #22758
Mandatory improvements to the s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User maoyg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User maoyg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User maoyg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User strob changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User fl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 10 22:41:35 +
2007 ---
I confirm there is still this "sort"-problem in version 2.3 !!
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 10 17:32:42 +
2007 ---
Its duplicate with 27925 and 22884
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User pagalmes changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 8 11:34:16 +
2007 ---
One can overcome this issue by replacing the "sort ascending" or "sort
descending"
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
User swubuntu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
32 matches
Mail list logo