[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 User syzygy changed the following: What|Old value |New value ===

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 15 16:57:39 + 2008 --- Point taken. I have filed Issue 85269 to receive any further discussion of the reg

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 11 22:13:44 + 2008 --- Well, it is quite a sophisticated discussion about [:name:] or [[:name:]] beeing th

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 6 12:59:36 + 2007 --- *** Issue 77248 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 User gudmund changed the following: What|Old value |New value ==

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 28 08:29:24 -0700 2006 --- ...same in 2.0.4RC3 --

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 27 23:41:48 -0700 2006 --- OK, now I understand and perl does require the additional brackets (though it still

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 14 12:05:32 -0700 2006 --- JES->ER: I'm glad we are in vehement agreement ;-) I only wished to take issue wit

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 14 07:31:52 -0700 2006 --- Jes, > > The use of constructs like [:digit:]? or ([:digit:]) is undefined. > > In

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 24 09:41:45 -0700 2006 --- I was going to make a similar point. Looking at the documentation both in the link

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 24 09:07:26 -0700 2006 --- > The use of constructs like [:digit:]? or ([:digit:]) is undefined. > In fact a be

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 24 06:18:14 -0700 2006 --- There are several misconceptions about named character classes in regular expressio

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 24 05:54:17 -0700 2006 --- *** Issue 66720 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 24 02:11:06 -0700 2006 --- Issue 66720 is a duplicate of this issue. See that issue for the additional informa

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 User jes changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 23 19:57:05 -0700 2006 --- Sorry, I'm really not sure where to put this, but as this issue seems to be active

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 User grsingleton changed the following: What|Old value |New value ==

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 User khirano changed the following: What|Old value |New value ==

[sc-issues] [Issue 64368] Inconsistant regex-support with named classes

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 User mike_hall changed the following: What|Old value |New value