To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
User mechtilde changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
User od changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 7 13:54:49 +
2010 ---
@aguelzow: Yes, sorry for the typo, it is of course mimetype.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
--- Additional comments from aguel...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 7 15:39:21
+ 2010 ---
aguelzow-od: you are absolutely right. I confused the table-properties with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
--- Additional comments from barthanss...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 6
07:55:34 + 2010 ---
The manifest.xml has an manifest:file-entry for a (non-existent)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
User od changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
User mav changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
--- Additional comments from o...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 6 08:55:24 +
2010 ---
Damn, again Bart was faster than me ;-)
But Bart's finding about the entry for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
--- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 6 13:50:32 +
2010 ---
Which OOo version claims that file would be corrupted? I don't get such a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
--- Additional comments from aguel...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 6 14:44:36
+ 2010 ---
@er OpenOffice 3.2.0 OOO320m12 (Build:9483)
ooo-build 3.2.0.7,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
--- Additional comments from aguel...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 6 14:48:36
+ 2010 ---
@mav: I don't see any mediatype stream in this file. Do you mean mimetype?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
--- Additional comments from aguel...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 6 16:17:10
+ 2010 ---
@od: You wrote: The usage of attribute style:writing-mode as an table cell
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
--- Additional comments from aguel...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 6 02:47:34
+ 2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=68759)
sample ODS file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110633
Issue #|110633
Summary|OOo claims that valid ODF files are corrupted
Component|Spreadsheet
Version|OOo 3.2
14 matches
Mail list logo
