[sc-issues] [Issue 15546] Enter-Key behaves not as in redmond office

2006-05-10 Thread lars
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15546 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 10 14:31:26 -0700 2006 --- *** Issue 65263 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sc-issues] [Issue 15546] Enter-Key behaves not as in redmond office

2006-02-21 Thread fst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15546 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 21 05:54:16 -0800 2006 --- *** Issue 62301 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sc-issues] [Issue 15546] Enter-Key behaves not as in redmond office

2006-02-17 Thread jbroth
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15546 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 17 04:03:40 -0800 2006 --- Now that 2.0 is out can this be added in at some point? JB --

[sc-issues] [Issue 15546] Enter-Key behaves not as in redmond office

2006-02-17 Thread herbalizer1
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15546 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 17 03:36:57 -0800 2006 --- I'm really sad, this feature wasn't implemented into Openoffice 2.0 I'm sure there

[sc-issues] [Issue 15546] Enter-Key behaves not as in redmond office

2006-02-17 Thread fst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15546 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 17 02:51:04 -0800 2006 --- *** Issue 57615 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sc-issues] [Issue 15546] Enter-Key behaves not as in redmond office

2005-09-15 Thread fst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15546 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 03:26:46 -0700 2005 --- *** Issue 53427 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***