To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 03:29:19 -0800
2005 ---
Thank you
My problem is, that I have to prepare documents to save them in mysql.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 9 01:10:44 -0800
2005 ---
@snoopy_78:
Hi,
this issue is fixed because the goal was to provide 65K rows. If
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 10:05:51 -0800
2005 ---
Please reopen this bug, because I need more then only 65k rows. I'm working for
a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 16:07:09 -0800
2005 ---
More than 65k rows is not necessary. You need a database. Use Base.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 18:06:50 -0800
2005 ---
Although I agree with the statement about using a database... wasn't there an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 18:57:29 -0800
2005 ---
Any other spreadsheet program does more than 65k rows?
VisiCalc, maybe?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 23 00:40:34 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 43347 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1967
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 26 08:09:35 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 41376 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***