[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-09-04 Thread drensink
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 4 19:31:57 -0700 2005 --- You didn't get my point. The argument doesn't have to be a direct value I think

[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-08-30 Thread er
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 30 04:02:53 -0700 2005 --- Hi Drensink, What should be exported if that argument is the result of a

[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-08-15 Thread er
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 03:13:55 -0700 2005 --- Hi Drensink, 6. For documents in openoffice to be exported to excel the user

[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-08-15 Thread drensink
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 19:32:08 -0700 2005 --- This gets a bit more complicated than it seems at face value, but I will continue

[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-08-15 Thread drensink
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 19:53:26 -0700 2005 --- One more note: It would be an irritatant to a user to have to add the ;1

[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-08-05 Thread drensink
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 5 21:10:25 -0700 2005 --- I gave my last comment more thought and realized you can maintain the same

[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-08-03 Thread er
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 3 08:30:45 -0700 2005 --- Drensink, Navvy, Please note that automatic translation is not feasible. It might

[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-08-03 Thread drensink
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 3 20:08:49 -0700 2005 --- Eike, I did not quite understand your comment at first, because the strings I

[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-08-02 Thread navvy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 2 08:35:00 -0700 2005 --- I agree with drensink. Automatic translation is what the user needs and expects.

[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-07-30 Thread drensink
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 17:13:09 -0700 2005 --- Instead of disabling regular expressions in the options when opening an excel

[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-06-30 Thread fst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 30 04:14:16 -0700 2005 --- *** Issue 51072 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-04-25 Thread navvy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 25 02:38:21 -0700 2005 --- The problem is Excel formulas that do not give the correct result in Open Office.

[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-04-23 Thread fst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 23 10:21:42 -0700 2005 --- *** Issue 48020 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-04-05 Thread fst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 5 06:00:41 -0700 2005 --- *** Issue 46706 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sc-issues] [Issue 32344] Simple wildcards * and ? as opposed to regular expressions

2005-02-10 Thread colms
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 11:20:00 -0800 2005 --- This issue has been proposed as a SO9 requirement. Please clarify what kinds of