To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4904
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 9 09:45:07 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 48761 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4904
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 2 06:51:25 -0700
2005 ---
Dan,
The range operator is not implemented at all, therefor this is a FEATURE, and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4904
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 09:08:02 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 47976 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4904
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 14 07:02:13 -0700
2005 ---
This is starting to sound like it's
really going to be an issue for people
switching
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4904
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 14 06:27:13 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 46210 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4904
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 9 08:24:08 -0800
2005 ---
This problem has been around for almost three years, which is a very long time.
When
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4904
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 7 03:36:48 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 43804 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4904
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 14 00:52:36 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 42678 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-