[sc-issues] [Issue 53940] Callout object duplicated on re-opening of spreadsheet

2005-11-21 Thread fst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 User fst changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 53940] Callout object duplicated on re-opening of spreadsheet

2005-11-05 Thread regina
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 5 08:16:16 -0800 2005 --- *** Issue 57400 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sc-issues] [Issue 53940] Callout object duplicated on re-opening of spreadsheet

2005-10-28 Thread fst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 06:14:45 -0700 2005 --- *** Issue 52861 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sc-issues] [Issue 53940] Callout object duplicated on re-opening of spreadsheet

2005-10-18 Thread fst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 User fst changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 53940] Callout object duplicated on re-opening of spreadsheet

2005-10-07 Thread nn
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 User nn changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 53940] Callout object duplicated on re-opening of spreadsheet

2005-10-07 Thread nn
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 User nn changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 53940] Callout object duplicated on re-opening of spreadsheet

2005-10-07 Thread nn
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 User nn changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 53940] Callout object duplicated on re-opening of spreadsheet

2005-09-29 Thread nn
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 User nn changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 53940] Callout object duplicated on re-opening of spreadsheet

2005-09-15 Thread sj
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 User sj changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 53940] Callout object duplicated on re-opening of spreadsheet

2005-09-14 Thread cemkaner
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 19:47:08 -0700 2005 --- I replicate the automatic duplication. OpenOffice 1.9.125 Win XP sp2 Create foo.ods

[sc-issues] [Issue 53940] Callout object duplicated on re-opening of spreadsheet

2005-09-12 Thread fst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 User fst changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 53940] Callout object duplicated on re-opening of spreadsheet

2005-09-10 Thread dabrown
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 10 10:25:30 -0700 2005 --- Forgot to add my version. I am working on OpenOffice 1.9.125. Sorry about that.

[sc-issues] [Issue 53940] Callout object duplicated on re-opening of spreadsheet

2005-09-10 Thread dabrown
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 10 10:22:54 -0700 2005 --- Derek Brown September 10, 2005 I was able to reproduce the bug exactly as describe