[sc-issues] [Issue 65002] can't create backup copy o n cifs samba shares

2007-02-16 Thread g111
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65002 User g111 changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 65002] can't create backup copy o n cifs samba shares

2007-02-16 Thread fst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65002 User fst changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 65002] can't create backup copy o n cifs samba shares

2007-02-08 Thread rainerbielefeld
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65002 User rainerbielefeld changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 65002] can't create backup copy o n cifs samba shares

2007-02-08 Thread vagula
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65002 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 9 07:24:16 + 2007 --- *** Issue 70600 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sc-issues] [Issue 65002] can't create backup copy o n cifs samba shares

2007-01-22 Thread dsitsolutions
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65002 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 22 10:53:59 -0800 2007 --- I can confirm this with version 2.1 on both Linux and Windows, and in Calc and

[sc-issues] [Issue 65002] can't create backup copy o n cifs samba shares

2007-01-22 Thread dsitsolutions
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65002 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 22 10:54:33 -0800 2007 --- I can confirm this with version 2.1 on both Linux and Windows, and in Calc and

[sc-issues] [Issue 65002] can't create backup copy o n cifs samba shares

2007-01-03 Thread episodeiv
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65002 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 3 02:17:13 -0800 2007 --- I can confirm this bug on OOo 2.1.0 running on gentoo. Disabling locking

[sc-issues] [Issue 65002] can't create backup copy o n cifs samba shares

2006-12-28 Thread olly600
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65002 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 28 00:46:33 -0800 2006 --- Please could you replicate this issue with openoffice.org version 2.1 and see if

[sc-issues] [Issue 65002] can't create backup copy o n cifs samba shares

2006-12-28 Thread zenyatta
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65002 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 28 02:57:42 -0800 2006 --- yes. same problem with 2.1.0 version.

[sc-issues] [Issue 65002] can't create backup copy o n cifs samba shares

2006-11-27 Thread axelmasok
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65002 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 27 19:33:03 -0800 2006 --- Yes I have always had this problem through versions of v2. Over Samba and over NFS

[sc-issues] [Issue 65002] can't create backup copy o n cifs samba shares

2006-11-01 Thread jernst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65002 User jernst changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 65002] can't create backup copy o n cifs samba shares

2006-11-01 Thread jernst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65002 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 1 06:22:37 -0800 2006 --- This bug affects all components, likely a framework issue.