To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 21 10:25:04 +
2008 ---
Any news?
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 21 17:21:03 +
2008 ---
I'm starting to work on writing a spec for this feature. Because this is a
little
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 21 17:25:14 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=55259)
formula convention (syntax) option page
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 3 14:34:31 +
2008 ---
@kpalagin: sorry I have not started it yet. I'm on several other high-prio
issues
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 2 04:59:20 +
2008 ---
kohei,
any progress?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 21 09:32:59 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=51624)
Updated spec to new selector control
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 14:22:51 +
2008 ---
@hashproduct: It is not a take-Excel-or-stick-with-OOO-style situation. Why do
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 14:36:57 +
2008 ---
@kohei: OK, I suppose it's reasonable to leave the three styles as they are for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 04:04:52 +
2008 ---
@kohei: OK. I guess my question is which set of conventions is considered
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 12 08:14:06 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=51469)
Updated
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 12 18:24:41 +
2008 ---
The updated specification looks good to me. There are a few typos that don't
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 12 19:43:25 +
2008 ---
@hashproduct:
Let's put it this way. OO.o A1 style is what we have natively in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 11 20:55:43 +
2008 ---
Please see updated spec (sorry for colors and fonts - could not match on
mockup).
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 11 20:41:19 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=51460)
Updated to accomodate requests
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
User hashproduct changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 11 23:36:29 +
2008 ---
The third sentence in Section 1, Detailed Specification, is still wrong. It
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 11 23:32:07 +
2008 ---
Two nits in the updated spec:
- The first entry under Suggested accelerator keys
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 11 11:34:22 +
2008 ---
I second that the naming (Absolute, Relative, ...) doesn't make sense. It should
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 11 12:48:52 +
2008 ---
IMHO it should go somewhere under Tools.Options.Calc
I agree with er here.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 11 01:37:04 +
2008 ---
I strongly object to the names of the cell reference styles (Absolute,
Relative
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
User kohei changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
User kpalagin changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 26 10:36:40 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=51170)
Proposed UI selector for addressing type.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 22 10:51:02 +
2008 ---
As a simple proposal: in main menu
[View] - [Addressing (or Notation?)] - then
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
User webpac changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
User jackflap changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 17 22:26:35 +
2007 ---
Dear developers,
any progress with this issue?
Thanks a lot for your attention.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
User kpalagin changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
User pagalmes changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
Issue #|72191
Summary|Need a UI to select which cell address convention to u
|se
Component|Spreadsheet
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72191
User fst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
33 matches
Mail list logo