[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2009-12-09 Thread ondrakl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 --- Additional comments from ondr...@openoffice.org Wed Dec 9 09:21:41 + 2009 --- HI! i found issue 33723 Ability to turn off Number Recognition for incomplete

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2009-12-03 Thread rainerbielefeld
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 --- Additional comments from rainerbielef...@openoffice.org Thu Dec 3 17:16:09 + 2009 --- *** Issue 106336 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2009-11-27 Thread rainerbielefeld
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 --- Additional comments from rainerbielef...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 27 10:43:41 + 2009 --- *** Issue 106924 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2009-11-27 Thread rainerbielefeld
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 --- Additional comments from rainerbielef...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 27 13:15:29 + 2009 --- *** Issue 87557 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2009-11-27 Thread ondrakl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 --- Additional comments from ondr...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 27 15:28:22 + 2009 --- In issue 87557 was not wanted date autoconvert in this cases: V1 -- 1.5.2001

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2009-01-12 Thread mawe3661
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 --- Additional comments from mawe3...@openoffice.org Mon Jan 12 12:35:41 + 2009 --- Any news? Do you need clarification of my suggestion?

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2008-04-23 Thread discoleo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 23 18:34:00 + 2008 --- Just as a note, issue 88429 emphasizes this same problem, see:

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2008-04-23 Thread discoleo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 23 18:43:52 + 2008 --- I posted the *wrong issue* in my previous post. This is now corrected: Issue

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2008-01-10 Thread fst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 User fst changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2007-12-14 Thread kohei
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 User kohei changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2007-12-14 Thread discoleo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 14 21:45:40 + 2007 --- Recently, there was a discussion on the SC-mailing list regarding the auto

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2007-12-14 Thread kohei
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 User kohei changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2007-11-16 Thread mawe3661
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 User mawe3661 changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2007-11-16 Thread discoleo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 16 15:51:54 + 2007 --- discoleo - mawe3361 You need NOT adjust the OOo version. This indicates, when the

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2007-11-16 Thread mawe3661
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 User mawe3661 changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2007-05-31 Thread mawe3661
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 Issue #|77973 Summary|A better way of treating numbers/dates?! Component|Spreadsheet Version|OOo 2.2

[sc-issues] [Issue 77973] A better way of treating n umbers/dates?!

2007-05-31 Thread discoleo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 User discoleo changed the following: What|Old value |New value