To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
User oc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
User oc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 30 14:58:06 +
2008 ---
@er: ah thanks! I hope you enjoyed your vacation. Everyone needs a break every
no
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 29 12:41:35 +
2008 ---
@kohei:
Just returned from vacation, hence the long silence..
> What is the sal.ma
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 8 14:53:14 +
2008 ---
Ah, nice! Sorry I couldn't get to this soon enough.
I have one question out of my
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 31 13:30:09 +
2008 ---
Hi Eike,
>could you imagine any negative side effect when doing so?
Not off hand.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
User rail changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 00:59:42 +
2008 ---
In the test file, the red cells show values that were previously mis-calculated
pri
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 00:57:17 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=52273)
test file
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
User kohei changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
User kohei changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
User kohei changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
User kohei changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
User kohei changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 6 22:24:34 +
2008 ---
Actually let's hold off on this. Reducing the precision will cause other weird
pro
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 6 18:48:11 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=51949)
test file to make sure the patch has not caused (o
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
User kohei changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
User kohei changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
User kohei changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 6 18:03:26 +
2008 ---
The first value (B1) returns 0.0 because the value being pushed to INT there is
0.9
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 6 17:59:26 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=51945)
test file that demonstrates the problem.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86775
Issue #|86775
Summary|INT function gives an unexpected result due to too muc
|h precision
Component|Spread
25 matches
Mail list logo