To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87468
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 5 19:47:32 +
2008 ---
*** Issue 95823 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87468
User oc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87468
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 2 20:10:51 +
2008 ---
*** Issue 91315 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87468
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87468
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87468
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 10:11:37 +
2008 ---
No, it's not, still present in DEV300_m18. When 1e-2 was entered in a formula,
e.g.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87468
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 14 13:11:13 +
2008 ---
Corrected in OOo3DEVm14
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87468
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 14 12:19:31 +
2008 ---
An easy workaround is to type "1e-02" instead of "1e-2". But it is totally user
unf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87468
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
