To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
User oc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
--- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 12 13:03:40 +
2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=68304)
slightly modified test case to include
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
User kami_ changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
--- Additional comments from ko...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 9 12:50:53 +
2009 ---
Too bad (for not making it into 3.2).
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
User kohei changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
--- Additional comments from ko...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 9 01:14:18 +
2009 ---
As we discussed in irc, I've revised my patch to get it to apply against recent
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
User kohei changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
--- Additional comments from ko...@openoffice.org Tue Jun 16 13:57:48 +
2009 ---
The revised patch checks for a presence of date values when building the unique
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
--- Additional comments from ko...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 15 19:28:25 +
2009 ---
Yup, I'm looking into it, right now.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
--- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Thu Jun 11 15:13:58 +
2009 ---
Kohei, could you please enhance the patch as I indicated in my previous comment?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
Issue #|94695
Summary|Filter on date unintentionally use time values
Component|Spreadsheet
Version|DEV300m32
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
User kohei changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 6 15:35:25 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=57029)
test document
19 matches
Mail list logo
