To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from w3...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 20 22:59:54 +
2010 ---
As I commented on March 23, 2006, I'm still using Word Perfect 12 for
corresponde
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from er...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 20 22:13:03 +
2010 ---
I'm with you Bob3! Mar 7, 2002 (the first RC bug entered) is a long time ago
and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from b...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 20 19:46:54 +
2010 ---
Happily, WP runs just fine in even a simple virtual machine; we're using the
now-d
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from opo...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 20 13:30:17
+ 2010 ---
Word and OO are unhelpful to writers who wish to self publish. Format is hugely
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
User huw changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from mest...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 19 21:23:29
+ 2010 ---
Interesting comments. I agree with irneb as many of his comments go along with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from wbru...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 19 11:24:33
+ 2010 ---
Irneb,
Very good explanation!
Totally agree that OO can't totally duplicate t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from ejo...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 19 11:01:47
+ 2010 ---
Thank you irneb for your explanation of the differences between WP and OO. I'm
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from ir...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 19 04:57:05 +
2010 ---
I think this is not going to happen exactly as per WP's RC. Therefore I'm
startin
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from ir...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 19 04:55:05 +
2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=67905)
Explanation of RC Alternative
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 18 21:55:11 +
2010 ---
> "4. Collect the money and "hire" a programmer for that. I would pay for
> this.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from mac...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 18 19:54:41
+ 2010 ---
I am not talking about charity -- I am talking about buying this feature.
Why
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from b...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 18 19:35:29 +
2010 ---
"4. Collect the money and "hire" a programmer for that. I would pay for this..."
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from mac...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 18 19:25:24
+ 2010 ---
> So I figure the following:
3. Elegance by obscurity -- RC would reveal to any
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from ksev...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 18 16:52:37
+ 2010 ---
The fact that people keep pleading for this feature when about everything that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from mest...@openoffice.org Tue Feb 16 16:27:57
+ 2010 ---
- Thank you for the links jctbvk. These are informative links to this subject.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from jct...@openoffice.org Tue Feb 16 10:33:00
+ 2010 ---
Maybe the following 2 links can give a better explanation for those who have
nev
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from jct...@openoffice.org Tue Feb 16 10:31:59
+ 2010 ---
Maybe the following 2 links can give a better explanation for those who have
nev
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from ir...@openoffice.org Tue Feb 16 04:57:04 +
2010 ---
If you need WP on Linux, you could try Wine -
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManag
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from b...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 15 22:05:30 +
2010 ---
The inability to "reveal codes" is why Open Office has not been adopted in our
off
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from wbru...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 15 16:46:14
+ 2010 ---
This is still the one thing which makes us (my wife and myself) go back to
Word
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from er...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 15 02:42:14 +
2010 ---
OK, I'm apologizing up front because this will be harsh and I don't have the
tim
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Sun Feb 14 15:54:06 +
2010 ---
I think the case for reveal codes was incorrectly stated from the beginning.
Revea
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from mac...@openoffice.org Sun Feb 14 12:43:45
+ 2010 ---
There are usually some voices against RC feature stating that user should use
s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from erand...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 22 21:30:35
+ 2009 ---
I started with WP 5.1, then years later moved briefly to WP10, then quickly to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from ir...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 29 07:55:26 +
2009 ---
@mestech (again) :)
Maybe that's a step in the right direction: have at least a v
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from ir...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 29 07:54:10 +
2009 ---
@mestech (again) :)
Maybe that's a step in the right direction: have at least a v
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from ir...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 29 07:34:47 +
2009 ---
It seems possible to at least have a display of what formatting is used, but
edit
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
User lijian changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from ejo...@openoffice.org Mon Sep 28 19:07:38
+ 2009 ---
And that's why I continue to use Word Perfect as my primary word processing
prog
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from mest...@openoffice.org Mon Sep 28 17:35:39
+ 2009 ---
It is a reveal codes type of feature.
Reading through this thread has provided
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from mac...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 23 16:20:09
+ 2009 ---
Is this macro a reveal codes feature? No -- then please open another report.
(
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from mest...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 23 15:39:37
+ 2009 ---
After reading on the OOo users mail list about another attack on the use of
Rev
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
User lendo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from mest...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 17 19:55:22
+ 2009 ---
Irneb,
I agree with your statement. It would be the only way to get around th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from ir...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 05:33:11 +
2009 ---
I also love the RC feature in WP. I'm just saying that now that I've actually
loo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from cabrink...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 00:23:59
+ 2009 ---
I have read through years of discussion about the addition of a Reveal Codes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from ir...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 29 16:34:08 +
2009 ---
I've attached a screenshot of the oXygen XML editor's method to show element
tags
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from ir...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 29 16:09:35 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=61891)
Example of element / formatting tags for XML
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from jmc...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 29 12:23:55
+ 2009 ---
This is just to remind all that the name of this (still) open issue is "Reveal
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 29 11:01:17 +
2009 ---
Dear mestech.
I completely agree with your comment. My comment with firebug was t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from mest...@openoffice.org Mon Apr 27 17:22:30
+ 2009 ---
dkerber, styles are already revealed. The tools to show styles are on the tool
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from ksl...@openoffice.org Sun Apr 26 14:51:34
+ 2009 ---
I am a strong supporter of this feature. As I child, I learned to write on the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from cnighswon...@openoffice.org Fri Apr 24
21:40:56 + 2009 ---
>this is BTS, it is for technical issues _only_.
Posts like this are not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from mac...@openoffice.org Fri Apr 24 18:16:33
+ 2009 ---
> Maybe if we changed the wording of the
> request from "reveal codes" to "revea
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from dker...@openoffice.org Fri Apr 24 17:57:02
+ 2009 ---
Maybe if we changed the wording of the request from "reveal codes" to "reveal
s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from mest...@openoffice.org Fri Apr 24 17:48:38
+ 2009 ---
Firebug may be useful for CSS but from the image I can quickly see massive
conf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from mac...@openoffice.org Thu Apr 23 07:42:16
+ 2009 ---
> I understand the discussion and the arguements both for and against
> this fea
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Thu Apr 23 07:28:17 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=61748)
Firebug screenshot, reveals formatting of "50 mil
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Thu Apr 23 07:20:30 +
2009 ---
I am an former WP5.1 user.
I understand the discussion and the arguements both fo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from mest...@openoffice.org Fri Jan 23 20:55:41
+ 2009 ---
Fortran_iv, well said.
I use styles and they are great. But there are times
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from cnighswon...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 22
15:44:08 + 2009 ---
Here is a poll I created to see just how many would like to see this featu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from jmc...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 22 10:04:49
+ 2009 ---
I fully agree with fortran_iv: I also do not understand such resistance to
this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from ir...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 22 06:55:32 +
2009 ---
Hear! Hear! Until Writer has a decent RC-like feature (not simply an add-on to
di
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from fortran...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 22 05:47:52
+ 2009 ---
I've read through nearly seven years of comments on this issue, and I don't
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
User macias changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 4 07:20:08 +
2008 ---
I wonder why "reveal codes" rings only "formatting" bell.
Reveal codes is not only
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 1 20:45:36 +
2008 ---
Today I was talking to a WordPerfect user that won't use OOo without a reveal
codes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
User robertf changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 11 19:42:19 +
2007 ---
Sun seems to give other features that address the average word user more
priority si
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 11:02:29 +
2007 ---
I'm a home user of Word Perfect & have been since WP first came out, many years
ago.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
User rpolach changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
User thing changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 06:45:10 +
2007 ---
It would be nice if you haven't voted for this issue to vote for it. It was in
the t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 05:20:02 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=49513)
Example of WP's RC
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 04:48:12 +
2007 ---
Yep, exactly. As I've said before: "If you simply want to replace Word, then
you're
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 7 20:18:08 +
2007 ---
If you want MS Word to continue to rule the world, don't implement this feature.
The
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 6 05:24:00 +
2007 ---
"different domains of those that prefer reveal codes and those that prefer
styles" T
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 5 21:37:08 +
2007 ---
soeiro I partially agree with you but any way of showing the points that
formatting,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 3 22:29:01 +
2007 ---
Hello All
The reveal codes function should not only reveal the formating codes, but
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 30 15:53:00 +
2007 ---
Bertram,
Well put. I wish I could have explained it that way.
I doubt that it wil
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 28 10:05:21 +
2007 ---
I'm 100% in agreement with bertram. This issue is the main reason that I have
rever
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 28 03:47:36 +
2007 ---
I'm very sad to see that this feature is not receiving the attention that it
deserve
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 20 08:57:29 +
2007 ---
That's the whole point - using Styles makes it much simpler to ensure consistent
for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 19 19:28:01 +
2007 ---
Well, it has been over two years since I made my first post to this thread.
I have
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 14 17:27:17 +
2007 ---
Because styles are the backbone of OOo and because manual formatting can seem to
bre
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 4 19:14:50 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 81267 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 12 18:42:45 +
2007 ---
Imeb, you point out the key reason for "reveal codes." Know exactly where to
insert
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 12 05:08:56 +
2007 ---
Yes, the Word "Standard + 8pt" in the font drop-down shows you what's cooking,
OOo d
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 10 10:56:58 +
2007 ---
But implementing a real reveal code feature like WP has is the better solution
than
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
User norbert2 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 10 10:52:56 +
2007 ---
Even MS Word is here ahead of writer! Word shows hard formattings next to the
style
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 10 10:52:38 +
2007 ---
Even MS Word is here ahaead of writer! Word shows hard formattings next to the
style
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 8 11:49:47 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 74332 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 30 21:18:01 -0800
2007 ---
I agree wholeheartedly. If OOo is simply a replacement for MS Office, then fine
you'
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 30 17:07:54 -0800
2007 ---
Codes were the best thing ever, and it is what made WordPerfect one of the best
word
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 9 07:02:25 -0800
2007 ---
Just come accross another problem in this regard. I've got a Heading2 as the
first
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 9 07:01:28 -0800
2007 ---
Just come accross another problem in this regard. I've got a Heading2 as the
first
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 26 22:27:04 -0800
2006 ---
I've been watching this topic for some time. What I've noticed is that the WP
propon
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
User pagalmes changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 22 13:35:34 -0800
2006 ---
I completely disagree with it being a battle between Styles and Reveal codes.
It's
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 22 08:45:29 -0800
2006 ---
I see this as a battle between those that find Styles to be the best and those
that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 16 13:51:53 -0800
2006 ---
Why has an issue with so much votes no target set?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
User rpolach changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
User norbert2 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
User erics changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
User david_flory changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
User irneb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 6 04:00:01 -0700
2006 ---
As an editor who has used the WordPerfect reveal codes function since it was
launche
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
