To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 14 12:24:02 +
2010 ---
That seems sane to me, yup
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 14 12:18:28 +
2010 ---
@cmc:
d'oh!
of course you are right!
114412 is now officially my unlucky number
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 13 19:28:15 +
2010 ---
um, http://hg.services.openoffice.org/hg/cws/sw34bf01/rev/6e6683f194c5 doesn't
m
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
User dtardon changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
User mst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
This issue depends on issue 114409, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 9 17:04:02 +
2010 ---
@dtardon:
d'oh, of course, now that you mention it i also see it :)
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
--- Additional comments from dtar...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 9 16:58:31
+ 2010 ---
dtardon->mst: because pLclD might have been created inside the function: see
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 9 13:54:54 +
2010 ---
@dtardon:
you've left the "if (...) delete pLclD" in the second copy of Str2Dou
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
User ama changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
--- Additional comments from a...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 8 14:34:08 +
2010 ---
.
-
Please
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
--- Additional comments from a...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 8 14:32:27 +
2010 ---
.
-
Please
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
User dtardon changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
--- Additional comments from dtar...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 8 13:26:54
+ 2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=71615)
remove the delete and simplify the code a bi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
Issue #|114412
Summary|sw: dubious delete in SwCalc::Str2Double
Component|Word processor
Version|DEV300m87
16 matches
Mail list logo