To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 11 09:57:48 -0700
2006 ---
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53771
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 31 10:25:39 -0800
2006 ---
by the way, changing "no fill" text to "not set" or "default", or "automatic
color"
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 31 10:04:35 -0800
2006 ---
this problem is still there in openoffice 2.0.2. a colleague and i were
convinced i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 11:53:36 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 54595 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 06:28:58 -0700
2005 ---
I assume the "transparency feature" you talk about is "PDF transparency"? but
"100%
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 05:07:26 -0700
2005 ---
Perhaps this issue is not only a problem of beeing not intuitive. How works the
PD
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 6 09:54:48 -0700
2005 ---
Okay this is going to make me look really stupid. I recently finished my really
im
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 5 08:24:41 -0700
2005 ---
No.
This bug is about "no fill" not being equal to "100% transparency". In other
w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 5 07:15:13 -0700
2005 ---
Okay but aren't you being a little pedantic? Does it really matter if the
causes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 5 06:01:20 -0700
2005 ---
Sorry, forget about my comment, I was thinking of different things...
But still you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 4 14:23:54 -0700
2005 ---
Huh? What was all this about if it doesn't support transparency then? And how
come
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 4 10:02:24 -0700
2005 ---
> I haven't noticed this issue in 1.1.4
No wonder, OOo 1.1.4 does not support tran
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 30 05:03:41 -0700
2005 ---
I haven't noticed this issue in 1.1.4 but I have certainly noticed it in 2.0
Beta!
14 matches
Mail list logo