To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44879
                  Issue #:|44879
                  Summary:|Suggest expansion of style hierarchy
                Component:|Word processor
                  Version:|OOo 2.0 Beta
                 Platform:|All
                      URL:|
               OS/Version:|All
                   Status:|UNCONFIRMED
        Status whiteboard:|
                 Keywords:|
               Resolution:|
               Issue type:|ENHANCEMENT
                 Priority:|P3
             Subcomponent:|formatting
              Assigned to:|mru
              Reported by:|bobharvey





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 12 05:58:00 -0800 
2005 -------
NB: This might be a 'framework' issue, as styles exist in all document types

I really, really, like the product.  But I am concerned that it is, in some
ways, hidebound by being too much like existing products, which means it is
shadowing the  mistakes as well as the good ideas of older products like
Wordstar, WordPerfect, Word, etc.

In particular, I am concerned (see late comment in issue 40885) about the
logical structure of documents.  Imagine a novel, or a report.  It consists of a
hierarchy:
Document 
  - Sections (Frontispiece, Introduction, TOC, chapters, appendicies, indexes)
    - Chapters contain paragraphs, illustrations, diagrams, figures
      - paragraphs contain sentences, inserts (foot & endnotes, asides)
        - sentences contain words, punctuation, separators
          - words contain characters, numbers, co-joiners

The style heirarchy we have consists of pages, paragraphs (which contain page
breaks!), characters.  You will notice that 'pages' do not appear above, not
'chapters' and 'sentences' in the list here..

Word Processing, as distinct from text editing, is a technique in which document
production is automated.  The use of styles is an abstraction which encapsulates
the attributes intended to perform that automation.  I am suggesting that the
abstraction we have could be radically improved by going back to the natural
structure of a document and reconsidering where and how the attributes are best
created and belong.

The current 'style' model is essentially flat, so that any particular bit of
text has a single set of paragraph attributes.  I am proposing a nesting
mechanism, so that italic or other-language sentences could live happily within
paragraphs, inheriting page margins but having thier own indents - for example. 
 

This is an expansion on the ideas of Issue 30503 and some of those in issue
40885.  I thought it would be useful to further abstract those ideas.  I suggest
that these thoughts could advance word processing radically and produce serious
product differentiation, and turn writer from a me-to product to one that leads
the pack.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to