[sw-issues] [Issue 44972] setting outline character' s line thickness

2010-05-19 Thread jes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44972 --- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Wed May 19 20:32:27 + 2010 --- Looks the same as Issue 12610 Issue 42020 covers other character outline paramet

[sw-issues] [Issue 44972] setting outline character' s line thickness

2010-02-08 Thread jondo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44972 User jondo changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 44972] setting outline character' s line thickness

2006-07-28 Thread pesala
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44972 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 28 00:42:16 -0700 2006 --- Correction: my mental arithmetic is a bit dodgy this morning. 50/2048 is 2.4% not

[sw-issues] [Issue 44972] setting outline character' s line thickness

2006-07-28 Thread pesala
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44972 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 28 00:38:28 -0700 2006 --- The attachment was produced in FontCreator from High-Logic using the Hollow Transf

[sw-issues] [Issue 44972] setting outline character' s line thickness

2006-07-28 Thread pesala
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44972 User pesala changed the following: What|Old value |New value ===

[sw-issues] [Issue 44972] setting outline character' s line thickness

2006-07-28 Thread pesala
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44972 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 28 00:13:18 -0700 2006 --- This can be achieved already by inserting Fontwork, but I agree it would be a very