To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46160
User hi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46160
User hi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46160
User maxweber changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46160
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 4 15:06:51 -0700
2005 ---
I agree that this is the same as 46093. Problem is that the summary and detail
of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46160
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 3 07:42:50 -0800
2005 ---
Further testing results:
1) The 'Env. 10' envelope does not print in 1.9.87.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46160
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 06:24:16 -0800
2005 ---
With further testing, I find that 1.1.4 prints a correct DL envelope with the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46160
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 10:29:27 -0800
2005 ---
I confirm this behaviour in 1.9.87 under Win2K and Win XP and using an HP
DeskJet
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46160
User es changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
