To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48865
User troodon changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48865
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 9 23:45:13 -0700
2005 ---
Just disabling the delay is not that a good idea since it is considered to be a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48865
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 00:59:25 -0700
2005 ---
tl,
I don't agree. Firstly, the formula is not much garbled: OOo is good at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48865
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 03:17:40 -0700
2005 ---
There is no 'going straight' when you tying and there is no delay!
The parser will
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48865
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 03:21:23 -0700
2005 ---
BTW: If you are a quick hacker you may just disable the automatic update with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48865
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48865
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 8 07:24:06 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 48859 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
