[sw-issues] [Issue 50683] WW8: WW97 master document links not correctly imported (not relative)

2010-11-11 Thread mru
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50683 --- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 11 08:10:40 + 2010 --- *** Issue 115509 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -

[sw-issues] [Issue 50683] WW8: WW97 master document links not correctly imported (not relative)

2009-02-14 Thread odalman
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50683 User odalman changed the following: What|Old value |New value ==

[sw-issues] [Issue 50683] WW8: WW97 master document links not correctly imported (not relative)

2006-08-30 Thread mba
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50683 User mba changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 50683] WW8: WW97 master document links not correctly imported (not relative)

2005-07-22 Thread umr5174
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50683 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 22 09:33:17 -0700 2005 --- This bug, which should be classified P2, is still in OOo 1.9.118.

[sw-issues] [Issue 50683] WW8: WW97 master document links not correctly imported (not relative)

2005-07-11 Thread umr5174
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50683 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 11 06:40:07 -0700 2005 --- This bug, which should be classified P2 to my mind, is still in OOo 1.9.113 .

[sw-issues] [Issue 50683] WW8: WW97 master document links not correctly imported (not relative)

2005-06-28 Thread umr5174
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50683 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 05:32:52 -0700 2005 --- The bug is still in OOo 1.9.109. It should probably be classified "P2". -