To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59185
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 06:31:53 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 42899 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59185
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59185
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 12 04:35:56 -0800
2005 ---
Indeed, on oooforum.org, it was braught to my attention that OOo seems to have a
li
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59185
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59185
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59185
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59185
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 14:06:34 -0800
2005 ---
Confirmed on OO0 2.0, Suse Linux 9.3.
At the end, _all_ of my field numbers were c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59185
User lars changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
