[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-11-24 Thread mru
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User mru changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-11-04 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 4 06:39:22 -0800 2006 --- this can be closed now for 2.1, right ?

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-09-29 Thread tuharsky
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User tuharsky changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-09-04 Thread mru
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 4 06:58:08 -0700 2006 --- I cannot share Regina's notice. I tested on Win98/2000/XP, Linux and Solaris. The

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-09-04 Thread regina
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User regina changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-09-04 Thread regina
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User regina changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-09-04 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 4 07:49:34 -0700 2006 --- regina, which font do you use? There were 2 fonts added on Apr 13th. The right

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-09-04 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 4 07:52:47 -0700 2006 --- OKie, you answered when I was still typing the question :) Yeah, the morning

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-09-03 Thread regina
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 3 05:41:30 -0700 2006 --- In the version Apr 13 12:37:00 the upper part of the characters is missing, not

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-09-01 Thread mru
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User mru changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-08-14 Thread mru
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 14 05:37:09 -0700 2006 --- *** Issue 67782 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-08-14 Thread tuharsky
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User tuharsky changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-08-09 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-08-09 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 9 01:44:06 -0700 2006 --- IH: It is really no good news that Radek's fix will not make it into 2.0.4. I am

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-08-09 Thread mru
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User mru changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-08-08 Thread cloph
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 This issue depends on issue 54450, which changed state: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-08-03 Thread mru
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User mru changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-07-26 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 26 01:38:19 -0700 2006 --- OK, cws created (sorry for delay). It is named opensymbol01 and contains the fixed

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-07-26 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User radekdoulik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-07-26 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 26 01:44:37 -0700 2006 --- IH: not sure whether you want to fix the linespacing problem in that cws or later

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-07-26 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 26 02:10:20 -0700 2006 --- IH-Radek: it is ok for me - fix this step by step and do the linespacing issue in

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-07-26 Thread ih
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 26 02:32:29 -0700 2006 --- IH-Radek: I've talked to mru from our QA and this is also ok for him. He we also

[sw-issues] [Issue 59997] some default numbering bul lets *not* in OpenSymbol

2006-07-02 Thread jrahemipour
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 User jrahemipour changed the following: What|Old value |New value