[sw-issues] [Issue 60611] 64bit?: linguistic: no ma tch for ‘operator+’ in ‘ByteString'

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60611 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value =

[sw-issues] [Issue 60611] 64bit?: linguistic: no ma tch for ‘operator+’ in ‘ByteString'

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60611 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 60611] 64bit?: linguistic: no ma tch for ‘operator+’ in ‘ByteString'

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60611 User mru changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 60611] 64bit?: linguistic: no ma tch for ‘operator+’ in ‘ByteString'

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60611 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 16 00:17:35 -0800 2006 --- pmladek: isn't this something for gcc41 or it was not a problem there? ---

[sw-issues] [Issue 60611] 64bit?: linguistic: no ma tch for ‘operator+’ in ‘ByteString'

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60611 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 16 00:12:00 -0800 2006 --- Please, do you have a CWS for this? If not, just approve the fix and we can commi

[sw-issues] [Issue 60611] 64bit?: linguistic: no ma tch for ‘operator+’ in ‘ByteString'

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60611 User kendy changed the following: What|Old value |New value ==