To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75027
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75027
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75027
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75027
User od changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75027
User od changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75027
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 2 11:03:48 +
2007 ---
Deeper investigation reveals, that the regression is already integrated into OOo
2.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75027
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 2 10:35:40 +
2007 ---
SBA: Sorry for my mistake. But "completely wrong" is not fair: 50% was correct:
It
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75027
User md changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75027
User od changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
