To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85725
User mechtilde changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85725
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85725
User od changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85725
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 5 13:52:18 +
2008 ---
First investigation reveals that several numbering/bullet list styles have
consecut
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85725
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 1 10:14:00 +
2008 ---
I have noticed that if I convert the document to WinWord and open the .doc
document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85725
User es changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85725
User es changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85725
Issue #|85725
Summary|Too slow to manage a document of 86 pages
Component|Word processor
Version|OOo 2.3.1