[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User tono changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 29 08:37:54 + 2007 --- @all: Finally!! The mingwport03 CWS is in the main trunk!! Now we can start the

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 29 13:20:17 + 2007 --- @vg: Thank YOU! I am checking out m207 now and I will go on to i75844. See you

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User vg changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 22 11:08:16 + 2007 --- vq: I'm using developer CVS for the buildbot MacPort1, it fails configure. I have

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 22 11:22:43 + 2007 --- @smsm1: I re-generated the configure script. Please, try new version (from the

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User tono changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User tono changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 22 14:13:54 + 2007 --- I have uploaded two more patches to fix build breaks in w32 MSVC build.

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 08:00:51 + 2007 --- Ooops, ILIB is set wrong. Sorry @vq Index: set_soenv.in

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 08:10:52 + 2007 --- @vq: external/glibc-2.1.3.patch seemes to be lost in resync. Rev 1.3 is tagged

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 08:42:35 + 2007 --- Unbalanced .IF in solenv. Index: tg_lib.mk

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 09:58:38 + 2007 --- More unbalanced conditionals in solenv. Index: tg_def.mk

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 11:40:10 + 2007 --- Another failed resync in neon/neon.patch Index: neon.patch

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 12:12:28 + 2007 --- Although it is intended to do nothing, it will break MSVC build. Index:

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 12:13:47 + 2007 --- @tono: please, please, please do NOT submit patches inline. Simply attach them,

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 12:57:03 + 2007 --- @vq: Sorry, I expected only a couple of build-breakers, sot this many. (I have

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User vq changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 13:51:34 + 2007 --- @all: Now all fixes in the cvs. Please check if everything is ok. I will start

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 16:21:47 + 2007 --- Waiting for anoncvs to sync with cvs. Cannot test until that has happened ...

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 07:37:56 + 2007 --- @all With what I read, we cannot integrate this cws, and must find a solution.

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 09:49:42 + 2007 --- @all: today I will finish the resync and will commit fixes for MacOS build

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 13:28:39 + 2007 --- @all: If the Mac build break is caused because static libraries are searched only

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 13:42:23 + 2007 --- @vq: Can you give me some time to check lost changes for mingw port itself?

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 13:44:57 + 2007 --- @vq: Can you take care of i#71986? tono (Takashi Ono)

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 14:15:51 + 2007 --- @tono: please, wait until we get the CWS integrated, do not make any fixes for

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 15:00:14 + 2007 --- @vg: Is it OK if I commit to the CWS directly? I'll only touch config_office.

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 23:24:30 + 2007 --- I have found the followings in the manpage of ld MaxOSX. If a static

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 23:46:03 + 2007 --- Got my system working again. The patch helps a little bit. The W32-.NET2003 build

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 19 09:39:29 + 2007 --- @all: today I will finish resync of the CWS to the m205. Please, come up with

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 19 13:09:17 + 2007 --- For the Mac-breakers, the order of the libraries during linking has to be reverted

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User maho changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User maho changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 19 23:14:47 + 2007 --- ericb, pjanik: this cws introduces breakage for MacOSX. Do you have an idea to

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User asrail changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 01:00:06 + 2007 --- @maho: It also breaks the OOo-style W32-.NET2003-**sh build. I looked at the diff

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 02:29:08 + 2007 --- tono, vg: could you please comment on what vq says and if possible, could you

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 16 13:23:37 + 2007 --- the build breaker on Mac (ld failed because of symbols not found) is caused by the

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 16 14:21:35 + 2007 --- another build-breaker in binfilter/filter/source/bf_offwrp Again reverting the

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 17 00:49:44 + 2007 --- @vq: Yes you are true. PSDK include directory is lost in SLARINC for MSVC build.

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 17 01:04:38 + 2007 --- @cloph: I have changed the lib sequence just to emphasize the fact that these

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 10:24:13 + 2007 --- @tono: good news - the cws is nominated, so will be in the main trunk in a couple

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User cloph changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 15:26:30 + 2007 --- It also breaks the normal W32 build, see here:

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 15:37:26 + 2007 --- I built the CWS for wntmsci10.pro. Can you reproduce the error?

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 19:48:28 + 2007 --- @vg: You probably used 4nt. Did you try using bash? I just restarted the

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 20:59:49 + 2007 --- @vq: I am afraid the cws was checked with w32-tcsh build only. tono (Takashi Ono)

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 21:08:25 + 2007 --- @cloph: I am a biginner with EIS. Can I see the build log of Mac build problem

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 21:48:14 + 2007 --- Yes, of course you can view the logs anonymously. EIS only embeds the data from

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 16 02:00:01 + 2007 --- I tried a W32-tcsh build, that fails too, see the tinderbox. It probably works

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User vg changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 17 15:41:09 -0800 2006 --- @vg: Thank you very much for your effort and help. I will wait for QA passing.

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 16 01:43:36 -0800 2006 --- @tono: FYI I have reverted back your changes in

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 16 08:21:07 -0800 2006 --- @tono: please prove if external/mingwheaders/makefile.mk is ok. The patch has

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 16 09:21:11 -0800 2006 --- @vg: I will review external/mingwheaders/makefile.mk. I think the directory will

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 11 06:23:57 -0800 2006 --- @vg: I am checking losts and requied patches for new things. The followning

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 10 05:48:00 -0800 2006 --- @tono: Good news: the mingwport CWS is now based on m192. Please, verify if

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User tono changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 7 13:25:56 -0800 2006 --- @vq: As MSVC build will not use configure script, I specified added part only for

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 6 04:38:44 -0800 2006 --- @tono: please, send me the patches for cws_src680_mingwport03 revision. I have

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User tono changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User tono changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 6 08:08:00 -0800 2006 --- @tono: cannot use moz (mozilla-source-1.7.5.patch) patch. Please, create a full

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 6 08:42:34 -0800 2006 --- @tono: in misc/build/Python-2.3.4/configure why have you rewritten

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 2 02:51:53 -0800 2006 --- @tono: i would use --exclude-libs,ALL for mingw only, because you never know what

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 2 05:28:12 -0800 2006 --- @vg: I have not yet made further modification to the patch for

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User tono changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User tono changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 2 08:04:28 -0800 2006 --- @vq: could you please review changes in config_office? They are commited in CWS

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 1 06:03:18 -0800 2006 --- @vg: I have modified patches for python and moz based on your comments and

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 31 01:59:11 -0800 2006 --- @tono:in

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 30 08:55:42 -0800 2006 --- @tono: in python, misc/build/Python-2.3.4/pyconfig.h.in I do not understand why

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 26 07:37:07 -0700 2006 --- @tono: I do not agree with changes in libxmlsec/xmlsec1-1.2.6.patch. Not all the

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 26 08:05:22 -0700 2006 --- @tono: i do not understand why in moz,

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 26 08:06:29 -0700 2006 --- @tono: i do not understand why in moz,

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 25 07:11:35 -0700 2006 --- @vq: As no implicit rule is defined for GCC before, even if an object is

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 25 07:15:55 -0700 2006 --- @tono: I do not agree with some changes i python

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 25 14:31:06 -0700 2006 --- @vg: The part of the patch in python is not at all intended. Most probably it was

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 24 08:24:13 -0700 2006 --- @tono: I do not understand in solenv/inc/rules.mk: .IF $(COM)==GCC .IF

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 23 08:10:56 -0700 2006 --- @vq: could you please review changes in config_office? They are commited in CWS

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User tono changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 16 05:43:28 -0700 2006 --- @tono: please, provide me patches to the cws_src680_mingwport03 revision on module

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 16 06:38:11 -0700 2006 --- @vg: Will you please clarify the meaning of module? Is one patch file for one

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 16 06:49:27 -0700 2006 --- @tono: that is exactly what I want.

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 This issue depends on issue 70431, which changed state: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 14 17:29:35 -0700 2006 --- @vg: I have checked out cws_src680_mingwport03 and found out some patches not

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 13 07:22:05 -0700 2006 --- @tono: you can make a patch against -rcws_src680_mingwport03. This branch contains

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 12 06:32:59 -0700 2006 --- @vq: The needed modifications for guw.cc are: 1) Handle '+' character in path

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 12 07:04:24 -0700 2006 --- 1) Handle '+' character in path names OK, but this can't be a new problem as I

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 12 07:25:52 -0700 2006 --- @vq: I have just noticed that smoe troubles related to the above 2 and 3 maight

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 11 14:24:40 -0700 2006 --- @vg: As I did no understand the supposed procedures, I have already started some

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 11 14:43:32 -0700 2006 --- ... And we have to modify the newly introduced guw.cc before merging to make it

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 10 06:22:17 -0700 2006 --- Hi, you new patch set - what revision is if for? I need a patches for the

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 10 07:13:56 -0700 2006 --- @vg: Do you like the whole patch set for m180? I can give you the updated patch

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 10 07:16:34 -0700 2006 --- @vq: Actually I have already found out some improvements and errors and tested

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 10 07:32:14 -0700 2006 --- @tono: Hi, i need only patches for the files, that i have mentioned above (aginst

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 User tono changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 53572] MinGW port efforts and inf ormation for SRC680 codeline

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 4 05:24:56 -0700 2006 --- I have attached updated patch set. It includes changed part only. It includes

  1   2   >