To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116845
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Feb 8 11:05:31 +
2011 ---
*** Issue 116814 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116845
Issue #|116845
Summary|smoketest should fail in non-product build when assert
|ions are raised during the test
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116845
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 7 12:39:54 +
2011 ---
@fs: You should close this as a duplicate of 109142.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116845
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116845
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116845
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 7 13:39:42 +
2011 ---
@fs: Different, in what way? Either you take the significance of assertions
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116845
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116845
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 7 14:05:28 +
2011 ---
@fs: I can understand your motivations, but do not agree with your
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116845
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 7 14:19:44 +
2011 ---
@sb: Well ... we should discuss this with a broader audience, then. I am very