To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
User maho changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 22 02:52:00 -0800
2005 ---
sorry, i don't see the connection between toplevel makefile and parallel build.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 04:13:45 -0800
2005 ---
beside denying the usefulness of a toplevel makefile at all:
your soultion forces
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 18:46:59 -0800
2005 ---
hjs:
thanks for your comment.
beside denying the usefulness of a toplevel
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 02:54:37 -0800
2005 ---
Since, at the top level makefile.mk doesn't understand the number of processes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
User maho changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
