To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 3 09:46:42 -0700
2005 ---
Erm, I propably didn't explain the problem here. Changing the dmake sourcecode
(see
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 3 08:39:30 -0700
2005 ---
I use a build-farm with 23 CPU's. OO.o builds for me with this number of
parallel
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 2 21:14:57 -0700
2005 ---
I can think of the use for higher number. Systems in build farms of various
Linux d
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
User mikeleib changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
