To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 03:13:25 -0700
2005 ---
looks good, worked on 8x ppc linux build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 17 16:35:34 -0700
2005 ---
I guess I nailed the hang. Beside the fact that the windows build was never
before
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 20:46:36 -0700
2005 ---
For the record: I can reproduce a STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION in sysintf.c line 657
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 5 23:50:54 -0700
2005 ---
I tried with the Sep 5 10:21:02 patch and on one platform got three broken
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 6 02:43:54 -0700
2005 ---
getting this in localedata with latest checkout of that dmake workspace
ERROR:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 6 02:44:48 -0700
2005 ---
on the other platform it appears to have stalled permantly on...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 6 06:35:33 -0700
2005 ---
The cryptic error from saxparser means that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 5 04:28:35 -0700
2005 ---
I applied the dmake part of the workspace and did a test spin, I get an error
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 5 07:27:54 -0700
2005 ---
Drat!
I know where the problem comes from:
-=-=-=-
aaa: (1)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 5 10:25:46 -0700
2005 ---
I also commtted the second patch.
@cmc: Can you please try again? You have to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 5 11:12:23 -0700
2005 ---
Did I mention that redirecting in the parent is evil? @#$%
BLOG
Guess what
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 5 13:58:29 -0700
2005 ---
Committed to dmake43p01.
@cmc: This works for me, Caolan can you test?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 4 12:39:25 -0700
2005 ---
Whoever had the idea of redirecting stdout before forking deserves to be beaten!
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 30 05:58:59 -0700
2005 ---
while hunting another issue, i noticed that STDOUT and STDERR are not flushed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 30 14:37:48 -0700
2005 ---
Thanks!
dmake/unix/runargv.c - line 152 calls fork without flushing stdout first.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 30 20:04:51 -0700
2005 ---
Would have been nice if that would have worked. I tried inserting fflush(NULL)
and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 30 21:24:09 -0700
2005 ---
The fflush() was a red herring, _exec_shell in function.c plays with dup(1)
and
30 matches
Mail list logo
